260: Why Courses Aren’t Supporting Implementation Anymore
In this episode of the Creator’s MBA podcast, I unpack why even the best digital courses are struggling to support implementation today. You might have strong content, a clear framework, and students who are genuinely eager to learn—yet still see them get stuck. The problem isn’t you, your material, or your students. It’s that the course model was never built to support real-time decision-making in complex, ever-changing contexts.
I’ll walk you through the real reason this mismatch is happening more often now, and why the solution isn’t always “add more content” or “go live more often.” You’ll hear how experienced learners, especially, need judgment-based guidance—not just information—and how new delivery models (including AI clones) are starting to fill that gap.
What You’ll Learn
Why traditional courses struggle with real-world implementation
How learning and working have merged—and what that means for creators
The difference between information transfer and context-based support
Why live calls are helpful but still not enough
The true scalability challenge behind coaching and hybrid models
How AI clones are being used to support implementation (without replacing teaching)
Why it’s not about teaching more—it’s about guiding better
If you’ve ever wondered why your students “get it” during the lesson but freeze during implementation, this episode is for you. You’ll leave with a new lens for evaluating your delivery model—and a preview of how to bridge that gap more strategically.
🎧 Listen now to reimagine how your course can actually support the way people work and learn today.
Mentioned in this episode:
Other resources:
Why Courses Aren’t Supporting Implementation Anymore
Your course isn’t broken—your delivery model is just outdated.
That’s the shift I want to talk about today. If you’ve ever created a course or membership and noticed your students still getting stuck—even though the content is solid—you are not alone. You’ve done the hard work: built strong frameworks, taught the principles, explained the process clearly. And yet, students stall in implementation.
It’s not a failure on your part or theirs. It’s that we’re asking the traditional course model to do something it was never designed to do: support ongoing decision-making in real-time, messy, real-world situations.
Let’s talk about why this gap is becoming more visible, and how we can start to bridge it.
The Course Model Was Built for a Different Kind of Learning
Courses work beautifully in structured environments. They were built for clean, focused learning settings—classrooms, workshops, trainings—where the learner can pause their world, sit down, and absorb new knowledge in sequence.
But that’s not how most of us learn anymore.
Today’s learners are implementing while learning. They’re building businesses, leading teams, launching products, managing clients—and trying to apply new knowledge on the fly. The separation between “learn now” and “apply later” is gone.
And that’s a massive shift. One that traditional course models just weren’t built for.
It’s Not a Learning Problem—It’s an Implementation Gap
Let’s say someone takes a business course with a clear framework. They watch the videos, take notes, understand the material. But when it’s time to apply it in their situation, they start asking questions like:
“Does this apply to me right now?”
“Which part matters most, given my priorities?”
“What if my business looks different than the examples?”
These are implementation questions. Not learning questions.
And most courses—by design—can’t answer them. They present the same information in the same order, regardless of who’s watching or what stage they’re in.
Implementation, on the other hand, is contextual. It requires prioritization, trade-offs, and judgment. It’s dynamic.
Why Adding “Live Support” Isn’t a Scalable Fix
Many of us (myself included) have tried to fill this gap with live components: office hours, Q&A calls, community threads, and direct support. These are incredibly helpful—because they reintroduce human judgment into the process.
But they also create new constraints: time zones, schedules, availability, and capacity. And they still rely on real-time access to you.
This is where most creators hit the wall. Because now we’re facing a trade-off:
Courses scale, but don’t support nuanced implementation.
Coaching supports implementation, but doesn’t scale easily.
We need a third option—something that brings judgment into the delivery model without requiring more of your live presence.
Why Experienced Learners Need a Different Kind of Support
This problem becomes even more pronounced with experienced learners. These are students who don’t need you to re-explain the basics. They need help choosing between options. They’re asking:
“Is this step still relevant for me?”
“Should I do A or B next?”
“What should I skip, and what’s non-negotiable?”
In other words, they need contextual guidance, not more content.
This is why hybrid models have exploded. It’s also why I started integrating new delivery tools—especially AI clones—into my programs. Because they allow you to embed judgment into your course, so that students don’t have to wait until the next live call to get clarity.
Enter: Judgment-Based Systems Like AI Clones
An AI clone isn’t a teacher. It’s not a chatbot or a content generator. It’s a tool that applies your decision-making framework in real time. When designed well, it can help your students ask better questions, avoid common missteps, and move forward faster—without needing you to be in the room.
For example, if your strategy only works under specific conditions, your AI clone can flag that and say, “Wait—this isn’t for you yet.” Instead of that information being buried in one video at the 12-minute mark, it becomes an intelligent guardrail.
It’s not teaching more. It’s protecting the framework from misuse.
And that, my friend, is the next evolution of delivery.
Final Thoughts
Courses aren’t failing. But they are incomplete.
They were never meant to carry the full weight of ongoing implementation. And if your students are getting stuck—even when the content is strong—it doesn’t mean they’re unmotivated or confused. It means they need a new kind of support.
Implementation requires guidance, clarity, and access to your judgment—not just your knowledge.
In the next episode, I’ll be talking about what usually comes next: the fear of losing control, authority, or IP when you start integrating AI tools. Spoiler alert: it’s possible to protect your work and scale your impact. But it starts by understanding the shift.
Pin this and save for later
Transcript: Why Courses Aren’t Supporting Implementation Anymore
[00:00:00]
Welcome to the Creator's MBA podcast, your go-to resource for mastering the art and science of digital product entrepreneurship. My name is Dr. Destini Copp, and I help business owners generate consistent revenue from their digital product business—without being glued to their desk, constantly live launching, or worrying about the social media algorithms.
I hope you enjoy our episode today.
[00:00:35]
Hi there, and welcome back to the Creator's MBA podcast. My name is Dr. Destini Copp, and I’m super excited you're joining me today. In this episode, I want to talk about why courses aren't supporting implementation anymore.
If you sell courses—or maybe you run a membership—there’s a good chance you've already sensed this. You deliver excellent content, you’ve got clear frameworks and strong explanations, you go deep into the material... and still, your students struggle.
[00:01:15]
That doesn’t mean your course is broken. It means the model is being asked to do more than it was originally designed to do.
In this episode, I want to explore why this gap exists, why it’s showing up more now than ever before, and why it’s not a personal failure—on your part or your students. It’s a delivery problem, not a quality problem.
[00:01:45]
Courses are great at transferring knowledge. But they’re far less effective at supporting ongoing implementation—especially in complex, real-world situations where the context is always shifting.
[00:02:10]
To understand why, we have to look at what the course model was originally built for.
Traditional courses assume a relatively clean learning environment. They assume someone can sit down, focus, move through the material in sequence, and apply it later. And that model made sense when learning happened in classrooms or dedicated training sessions.
[00:02:45]
But that’s not how people learn today. Most learners are trying to implement while they learn. They’re learning inside their business, their job, their leadership role, or their creative practice.
And that changes everything.
[00:03:10]
Let me give you an example. Say someone buys a business course that teaches a clear framework. The framework makes sense. They watch the videos, maybe even take notes, and think, “Okay, I’ve got this.”
Then they sit down to apply it—and that’s where things start to unravel.
[00:03:35]
Now, they're not asking, “What is the framework?” They're asking, “Does this apply to me right now?” Or, “Which part matters most in my specific situation?” And, “What if my constraints don’t match the examples in the course?”
These are implementation questions—not learning questions. And most courses aren’t designed to answer them.
[00:04:15]
Courses are static by nature. They present information in the same way, in the same order, no matter who is watching or what stage they’re in.
But implementation is situational. It depends on timing, context, and trade-offs. That’s where the mismatch shows up.
[00:04:45]
Your students aren’t stuck because your content is unclear—they’re stuck trying to translate general advice into specific action. And they’re doing that without feedback or support at the moment they need it.
[00:05:10]
That’s why so many course creators (myself included) add live components: office hours, Q&A calls, community access. These aren’t fluff—they’re attempts to bring judgment into the process and help students apply the course material.
[00:05:35]
But live support introduces new challenges—scheduling issues, time zones, limited capacity—and still relies on real-time access to the expert.
[00:05:50]
Here’s another example. Imagine a course that teaches a multi-step process. In theory, students follow the steps in order. In practice? They jump ahead, skip steps, circle back, or try to combine pieces. And sometimes that’s fine—but sometimes it breaks the model.
[00:06:20]
As the expert, you know which steps are flexible and which aren’t. But that information isn’t always baked into the course. So students make reasonable decisions based on incomplete guidance—and when it doesn’t work, they think the framework failed.
[00:06:45]
Again, it’s not a motivation problem. It’s an application problem. Courses do a great job explaining what and why—they struggle with when and in what order. Especially when the learner’s context varies.
[00:07:10]
This becomes even more obvious with experienced learners. They don’t need more foundational material. They need help making choices, prioritizing, confirming their approach. They need someone—or something—to say, “Given your situation, this matters more than that.”
[00:07:40]
A static course can’t do that. That’s why we’ve seen such a rise in coaching, consulting, and hybrid models. I started offering hybrid programs years ago because I saw this shift coming early.
[00:08:00]
These formats work because they deliver judgment, not just information. But they don’t scale easily—they rely on your time, your energy, and your availability.
So here’s the trade-off:
Courses scale—but struggle with implementation.
Coaching supports implementation—but doesn’t scale.
[00:08:30]
That’s the gap new delivery models are trying to fill. This is where carefully designed AI-based systems start to make sense.
[00:08:45]
An AI clone (which I’ll be talking more about in the next episodes) doesn’t fix the problem by teaching more content. It fixes it by making your judgment available at the moment your student needs it.
[00:09:05]
So instead of rewatching videos or searching through forums, a student can describe their situation and get guidance that reflects how you would think through it.
[00:09:20]
Let’s make this concrete. Imagine a course that teaches a marketing strategy that only works under certain conditions. The instructor knows this, and she might say, “Don’t use this if you’re just getting started,” or “This only works once you’ve got steady traffic.”
[00:09:45]
But that’s usually mentioned once in a video, buried in the middle. In a judgment-based system, those caveats become rules. The system checks: is the condition met? If not, it won’t recommend the strategy.
[00:10:05]
This doesn’t replace the course—it protects the course from being misused.
[00:10:20]
And that’s why I keep saying: Courses aren’t failing. They’re just incomplete. They weren’t designed to carry the full weight of implementation. They were built to teach concepts, frameworks, and processes.
[00:10:45]
But implementation requires something else: guidance that’s context-sensitive, applied repeatedly over time.
[00:11:00]
This is the shift we need to acknowledge. Courses alone are no longer enough for the way people actually learn and work today.
[00:11:15]
In the next episode, I’ll address the fear that usually comes up when creators realize this gap—the fear of losing control or IP when integrating AI. We’ll talk about how experts are using AI clones without diluting their authority or giving away their best thinking.
[00:11:45]
If this episode helped put language to something you’ve been feeling—whether as a learner or a creator—I’ve written more about it on my website. You’ll find articles that break down the pros and cons of different delivery models and where they tend to fall short.
[00:12:05]
Thanks so much for listening. I hope you enjoyed this episode, and I’ll see you in the next one. Bye for now.
[00:12:20]
Thanks for listening all the way to the end. If you love the show, I’d appreciate a review on Apple Podcasts or your favorite podcast platform. Have a great rest of your day—and bye for now.