Why Monthly Events Changed How I Think About Revenue at HobbyScool
January has usually been one of the slower revenue months for HobbyScool, so when we decided to run a smaller event to kick off the year, I wasn't expecting anything big. I wasn't trying to prove a point or manufacture a win. I just wanted to see whether this could work consistently if we kept doing it.
The real question was whether monthly virtual events could create more predictable revenue for HobbyScool over time, and that matters more than it sounds like it does.
As HobbyScool has grown, I've learned that meaningful revenue doesn't usually come from people randomly finding us online, opting into a funnel, and quietly purchasing something. That does happen and it plays an important supporting role, but it isn't what drives scale for this business.
For HobbyScool to grow toward $1M, there has to be a reason for people to pay attention now. There has to be a moment that creates focus and urgency, and that's what campaigns, promotions, and events are for.
So in January we ran the Creative Vision Retreat as part of a broader shift to monthly virtual events. It wasn't our biggest event. It was profitable, well received, and repeatable, and that last word is the one that changed how I think.
"Predictable revenue doesn't come from one standout launch. It comes from committing to a model that works well enough and improving it over time."
Dr. Destini CoppWhat January Revealed About How Revenue Actually Shows Up
Here's the thing I couldn't see clearly until we ran a smaller event in a slow month.
Revenue in this business doesn't arrive because someone stumbled onto us and decided today was the day. It arrives because something is happening. A date, a lineup, a window that closes. Take away the moment and the same audience, with the same offers in front of them, mostly does nothing, and that isn't a flaw in the audience. That's how people buy.
Which means the honest lever isn't optimizing the offer. It's how often you create a reason to act.
January also showed me that the size of the moment matters less than the existence of one. A smaller event in a historically quiet month still produced, which told me the slow months were never really about seasonality. They were about nothing being on the calendar.
Why Monthly Events Make the Business Feel Scalable
Two or three big events a year makes every one of them a referendum. Twelve smaller ones makes each a data point, and that changes everything about how the business runs.
Twelve Reasons to Pay Attention
Every event is a moment with a date attached, which is the thing evergreen assets can't manufacture. Running them monthly means the audience always has something coming up, so we're never trying to restart interest from a standing stop the way you do after a long quiet stretch.
A Calendar You Can Forecast Against
When you know what's running each month, you can plan promotion, staffing, and cash ahead of time. The open question shifts from whether anything is happening to how well a known thing performs, and that second question is far easier to manage and far easier to hand to a team.
A Faster Learning Loop
Two events a year gives you two chances to learn anything. Twelve gives you twelve, and every one of them tells you something about pricing, promotion timing, and which topics pull. The model gets better through repetition instead of through one long planning session and a lot of guessing.
Lower Stakes on Any Single Month
When one event carries half your year, a soft result is a crisis. When it carries a twelfth, a soft result is information. That takes real pressure off the decisions, and it means we can try a topic we're unsure about without gambling the year on it.
Assets and Relationships That Compound
Each event brings new speakers, new attendees on the list, and a growing library of content and process. The twelfth one is easier than the first because the pages, the emails, and the speaker relationships already exist, so the model gets cheaper to run as it goes.
Why Newsletters and Evergreen Funnels Aren't Enough on Their Own
I want to be careful here, because this isn't an argument against evergreen systems. We run them and they matter.
But an evergreen funnel has no deadline in it. Nothing about a nurture sequence tells a reader that this week is different from last week, so it converts the small percentage of people who happen to be ready right now and the rest keep reading and keep not buying. That's not a broken funnel, that's just what evergreen does.
Events supply the thing evergreen can't, which is a reason today is different. And evergreen supplies the thing events can't, which is what happens to everyone who showed up and didn't buy. The event brings a wave of new people in, and the newsletter and the funnels are what keep them until the next moment comes around.
Events create the spikes. Evergreen holds the floor between them. Trying to run a creative business on only one of those is why revenue either feels flat or feels like whiplash.
What Happened After January
This post originally went up in January while the experiment was still fresh, so here's the update from the far side of the year.
The monthly model held. We also ran a very different experiment in parallel, going after corporate wellness buyers and corporate sponsors for our summits, and we shut that one down. The cold outreach cost more attention than it returned, and every hour spent hunting for an HR director was an hour not spent on speakers and events.
Which is how the January experiment quietly became the strategy. We're doubling down on running monthly events, getting the right speakers in the room, and delivering them to the B2C audience that already knows us. The thing that worked in the slowest month of the year turned out to be the thing worth protecting.
The Part Worth Stealing
Predictable revenue doesn't come from one standout launch or a perfectly optimized funnel. It comes from picking a model that works well enough, committing to it, and improving it every time you run it.
That's a less exciting answer than a breakthrough, and it's the one that actually scales. A smaller event you can run every month beats a large one you can only survive twice a year, and the compounding shows up in the second half of the calendar rather than the first week.
I'm documenting all of this inside the $1M HobbyScool Experiment, which is the ongoing work of building HobbyScool into a business someone would pay $1M to own. That number is a sale price and not an annual revenue goal, and the whole point of documenting it publicly is that the reversals teach more than the wins do.
Is Your Revenue Predictable or Just Busy?
Take the free Creator Business Scorecard to find which part of your business is capping your growth, and what to build next.
Take the Free Scorecard →Frequently Asked Questions
Monthly events give the business twelve reasons a year for people to pay attention now, instead of two or three. Each one is smaller and lower stakes, so a soft month does not sink the year, and the whole operation gets a repeatable shape the team can run rather than a scramble that starts over each time.
No. The January event that changed my thinking was one of our smaller ones. It was profitable, well received, and repeatable, and repeatable is what mattered. A smaller event you can run every month beats a large one you can only survive twice a year.
They are necessary and usually not sufficient on their own. Evergreen assets keep a steady baseline running and they rarely create urgency, because nothing about them asks a reader to act this week. Events supply the deadline, and the evergreen systems catch and keep the people the events bring in.
Because the calendar comes first and the revenue follows it. When you know what is running in each month, you can forecast, staff, and plan promotion in advance. The uncertainty moves from whether anything is happening to how well a known thing performs, which is a far easier problem.
It is a public documentation of the work to build HobbyScool into a business someone would pay $1M to own. That number is a sale price rather than an annual revenue goal, and the project covers the real decisions and tradeoffs as they happen, including the experiments that get shut down.
